follow us:

Latest News

Experience more lore in the Dragon’s Dogma digital comic
Comics and video games are about to cross over into each other once more as Capcom released the first in an ongoing series of digital comics based on Dragon's Dogma.... [read more]
Defenders of Ardania Contest
In our review of Defenders of Ardania, we praised the game for letting your directly attack the enemies unlike other Tower Defense games.  We want to share this experience with you guys by ... [read more]
New live-action Prototype 2 trailer will make you
Want to know how you can get me excited for a game? Use Johnny Cash's "Hurt" as the music for your trailer. Prototype 2 will be coming to Xbox 360 and PS3 on April 24th.... [read more]

Latest Articles

From the Editor's Desk: Is the Gamestop Lawsuit Good or Bad for Gamers?
Gamestop settled on a lawsuit regarding the sale of used games that are missing DLC. Is this lawsuit a win for gamers or will this cause more problems for gamers? ... [read more]
5 Great Video Game Parodies
The best distractions come in the form of short, and hilarious parodies. There are hundreds of humorous video game parodies online. Let me guide you in your distraction with this list of 5 fantastic video game parodies. ... [read more]
SXSW 2012: Indie Game: The Movie Review
It's funny how a movie like Indie Game: The Movie fits so perfectly with a venue like SXSW, where indie game companies show off their games in SXSW Screenburn and indie filmmakers show off their latest movies in SXSW Film. ... [read more]

Latest Reviews

Dustforce Review
In the PC title Dustforce by Hitbox Team it's up to you to clean up the world...make that four worlds. Specifically, a Forest, Mansion, City and Laboratory. The dirt and flith is so bad that it's starting to put up a fight and it's up to you to fight back as one of four supe... [read more]
Naruto Shippuden Ultimate Ninja Storm Generations Review
To celebrate the 10 year anniversary of the Naruto anime series Cyber Connect 2 and Namco Bandai has gathered every major ninja from the show for the ultimate ninja battle in Naruto Shippuden Ultimate Ninja Storm Generations. Is this a ninja battle of epic proportions or jus... [read more]
Defenders of Ardania Review
The Tower Defense genre is perhaps one of the more saturated in gaming at the moment. Because of this, if a game wants to stand out from the rest of the pack, it has to do something a little different. Defenders of Ardania does this by attempting something so simple that it... [read more]

Latest Videos

From the Editor's Desk: Is the Gamestop Lawsuit Good or Bad for Gamers?
Gamestop settled on a lawsuit regarding the sale of used games that are missing DLC. Is this lawsuit a win for gamers or will this cause more problems for gamers? ... [read more]
SXSW 2012: Indie Game: The Movie impressions
At SXSW 2012, Indie Game: The Movie was screened as part of SXSW Film. The RPG Fanatic was able to catch one of the screenings, and has some thoughts on the movie. ... [read more]
Gear Unboxing: ROCCAT Isku Gaming Keyboard
ROCCAT is a German accessory manufacturer that's looking to bring their high-ending gaming equipment over to the U.S. and takeover. The ROCCAT Isku Gaming Keyboard is looking to do more than just impress you with lighted keys. ... [read more]
Review Scores: A 5 Out of 10?
Posted on January 05, 2012 by Jack

As a video-game writer, perhaps one of the tasks that I find most difficult is assigning a score to the bottom of a review. Sometimes, I can play a game for a mere couple of hours before a potential score starts to form in my mind, and all that is left to do is fill in the blanks with supporting pros and cons. Other times, however, I can have experienced all there is to do with a particular game, have pages of notes, and sometimes even have the review itself written, and I still can’t decide on which score to award. Surely there must be an easier way?

Review scores come in many different shapes and sizes; the most common being stars, percentages, and marks out of 5, 10 or 100. The difficulty with all of these competing systems is attempting to find a middle-ground by which a universal judgement can be obtained. The website Metacritic has attempted to fill this void, but with their assessment criteria largely remaining a mystery, the extent of its success as an objective source has been questioned by more than a few sceptic observers. Despite this, metacritic averages have begun popping up on developers’ resumes, in evidence of their skills, and some publishers have begun demanding high metacritic averages, as well as high sales, as evidence of a title’s success.

But do scores even matter that much? If you’re after a quick snap judgement on whether a game is good or not, then sure, a quick glance at a solitary figure can give you an idea of a game’s merits, but the text of a review is where you’ll need to look if you want any form of understanding as to why (or why not) a game is worth purchasing. The text gives a writer the chance to explain themselves, to inform the reader why they believe the game is worth their hard-earned money, or why you should steer well clear. It’s also the text of a review that may give you an idea whether or not you actually agree with what the reviewer is saying, rather than just looking at the score and either dismissing or endorsing the game based purely on a 4.0 or a 9.5.

It’s this 4.0 or 9.5 that I find the real problem with scoring game reviews, however. Can you remember the last time you saw a 2 awarded, or a 3? Let me ask you another question. If a game scores a 7, is it good or bad? How about a 6.5? I’m as guilty of this as other people, but for some reason, when a game scores anywhere between a 5 and a 7, it’s automatically written off as a bad game, despite the score being (supposedly) above average. Furthermore, the area below a 5 seems to be some sort of void, where no game reviewer ventures, instead effectively reducing a 10 or 20 (if using .5s) level scoring system to half its intended range. It’s the same with a percentile scoring system, where anything below a 70% is seen as a failure. Game review scores are, for the large part, hideously skewed, leaving the majority of releases sitting somewhere between a score of 7 and 9, when if we used the whole range properly, an average score of anywhere between a 4.5 and a 9 would be much more realistic.

If we place this issue into a real-world setting, we can begin to see where the problem might originate. From an early age, we are awarded grades and marks for our work at school, and we are understandably pushed to get the highest marks possible. Therefore, when you score a 60 or 70 on a piece of work, it can be viewed as a failure, even though in reality it equates to a B or C grade, which is a pass. Can you remember how terrified you where to come home with a bad mark for an assignment, or even a bad report card at the end of a semester? This method of thinking has carried over into our adult lives, affecting our judgements on a day-to-day basis.

And it is day-to-day that we have to make these kinds of score-based snap judgements, often regarding things we don’t fully understand the workings of. GPAs, University marks, Film and Game Reviews, Politician’s approval ratings, and credit scores are all examples of numerical ratings we have to pretend that we understand in order to make judgements. With regards to video game review scores, some websites or publications have a brief guide as to what their different scores equate to, but you’re often still going on the personal opinion of the reviewer, which is next to impossible to judge the forming process of from a score alone.

Think about when you ask a friend or colleague for advice on a piece of entertainment, a restaurant, or a city they’ve recently visited. If they replied with, ‘oh, I’d give it a 5’, or ‘I reckon it was somewhere between an 8 and a 9’, would you be satisfied with that answer? No, you wouldn’t. You’d ask for more information as to why they felt that way, particularly if you were on the fence as to whether you were going to splash out or not. Now I understand that with text-based reviews you often can’t have that one-to-one dialogue with the writer, but the text is there for that very reason.  Their explanation for the score that they have awarded is often evident in the writing, and even if the score and the text don’t quite match up, at least you have a better understanding of what they thought about the game. Yet people are still too willing to just look at only the score, and walk away satisfied with what they’ve learned.

When I began thinking about this piece I thought back to the games that I have reviewed in my time writing for this site, and I realised that I was as guilty as the next reviewer of ignoring almost half of the range of scores allowed to me. Once this had dawned on me, I pledged to attempt to judge games in a fairer manner, perhaps awarded harsher scores to some, but if this allowed me to better express my feelings on a game, then so be it. The problem that I realised with this line of thinking, however, was that the reader might still be operating on the skewed score system of before. Not that this changes my outlook, I still intend to review games on the ‘fairer’ scale, but it leads me to propose that not only do we need to re-educate reviewers on how to score games correctly, but we also need to educate the readers on how to read a review correctly as well.



What are your thoughts on review scores?  Let us know in the comments.

Jack - Staff Writer jack (@) | all author's articles

What do you think of the Gamestop settlement in California?

Gamestop got exactly what it deserved. They've been screwing over gamers for too long.
The lawsuit was stupid. Consumers should have known better, and now, Gamestop will start reducing prices of trade-ins.
View Results - View Comments


SXSW, Mass Effect 3 Controversy, and More Assholes From Kotaku

MGS Peace Walker Gets Perfect Score, Kotaku Writer Cries Foul

So You Want To Be a Game Reviewer?

Shinobi Review

Other Gaming News From The Web
Gaming News